Sunday, February 1, 2009

Suspicion


In the film “Suspicion,” Alfred Hitchcock creates narrative meaning through shot combinations and expressive narrative space. “Suspicion” (1941) tells the story of a proper British woman, Lina, (Joan Fontaine) and a charming, smooth man named Johnnie (Cary Grant) who fall in love and get married. It isn’t until they return from the honeymoon, however, that Lina begins to uncover the deceitful, gambling character of her new husband, and slowly becomes more and more suspicious of him until she is convinced that he plans to kill her in order to collect insurance. Throughout the film, Hitchcock uses different techniques in order to force the viewer to feel the doubt that plagues Lina’s psyche. The setting of the movie, especially the indoor scenes, is filled with heavy shadows and darkness. In addition, the frequent switching of shots between Lina and Johnnie throughout the movie allows the audience to draw connections between the significance and moods of the characters. Hitchcock creates a symbolic narrative space that helps represent the tone of the film.

In “Narrative Space,” Stephen Heath speaks about the evolution of narrative space in cinema. Originally, the purpose of film, and therefore the narrative space, was to mirror reality: “the space of film is the space of reality; film’s ambition and triumph is to ‘reproduce life.’” However, as the industry progressed, movies tended to have more symbolism and opinions, and therefore the space in the film became an opportunity for movement and significance, rather than just a backdrop. Throughout “Suspicion” light and darkness play a key role in conveying the doubt and mistrust that increasingly obstructs Lina throughout the film. The very first scene of the movie, (on the train), begins in complete darkness that foreshadows the rest of the film. Later, after Lina learns about Johnnie’s lies and gambling, her world becomes more and more cluttered by doubt. Hitchcock shows her home, which should be a place of light and comfort, as a cold, open building filled with darkness and shadows. Finally, the most telling in regards to the narrative space, at the height of Lina’s suspicion, Hitchcock composes a shot of pitch black and aims the camera on the floor, allowing a narrow pool of light to spill in and showing only the threatening, ominous shadow of Johnnie, and proceeds to follow him in dark, demonic lighting walking up the stairs to give his wife a glass of milk. The narrative space becomes like a character in the film: evolving as the plot progresses and reflective of the tones Hitchcock wishes to portray. It is the well-calculated composition of this setting that draws the audience in, forcing them to feel the doubt that envelops Linda’s character.

Another way that Hitchcock brings to life the narrative meaning of “Suspicion” is through the constant shot-reverse-shot he uses to portray Lina and Johnnie’s relationship. In these short, clipped shots, it is not necessarily the dialogue (if there is any) that is important, but rather the out of frame gazes that tell the story. It is the audience’s interpretation, namely how they connect the shots, that also creates a feeling suspicion in the film.  When Lina and Johnnie are on better terms, especially at the beginning of the film, the shots often contain both characters, and the gazes are loving, usually at each other. However, once the doubt begins to settle, the shots become choppier and tighter on Lina and Johnnie’s faces. In the scene in which Johnnie returns from his trip and Lina is sure that he has murdered his childhood friend, the two characters sit next to each other, but the camera does not really show them as such. Instead, as the conversation progresses, the camera switches back and forth between their faces, Johnnie’s reflecting his supposed nervousness and Lina’s showing her horror, both of them looking into space rather than each other. As an audience, we know they are not looking at each other, and the the shallow composition and rapid movement between the two characters that expresses the tension in the scene. It is often the connection of the shots that gives the emotions of the film power and narrative meaning.

Without significant narrative space and careful cinematography, “Suspicion” would struggle to express the narrative meaning it is able to successfully reveal. The audience, while probably engrossed in the plot, would not feel the tension and anxiousness that Hitchcock brings to the scene through tight, reversing camera movements and carefully constructed narrative space. It is the audience’s interpretation of the vigilantly assembled visuals that creates the doubt and wariness that make “Suspicion” successful. 

7 comments:

  1. I thought it was interesting what you noticed about Hitchcock's use of the shot-reverse-shot. In the scene you mention in which Johnnie returns home from his trip, Lina is feeling a void in her relationship with her husband, not knowing whether or not she can trust him. By showing the couple's faces in entirely separate frames and having them focus out into space rather than on each other, Hitchcock succeeds in literally showing the audience the distance and separation Lina feels from her husband at that point.
    You also remarked on the lighting in the scene in which Johnnie brings Lina the glass of milk. However, you failed to mention the lighting of the glass of milk itself, which also greatly contributes to the rising suspense. Even in the little snapshot posted in this blog, our eyes are immediately directed to glass of milk, as it has a sort of ominous glow about it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What you say about Hitchcock's use of the shot-reverse-shot is true; through his clever use of eye-line matches and spatial juxtaposition, he successfully develops the story and lends a dynamic character to its visual narrative.

    Cooper greatly stresses the importance of spatial transformation in lending coherence to the narrative. However, I believe it is both a combination of spatial continuity and editing that made "Suspicion" such a rich story without relying on dialogue. Your point on this made me recall the clip that Professor Mottahedeh presented in class, of Hitchcock explaining the importance of editing in shot-reverse-shot and insert shots.
    Using his example, a close up of an old man slowly smiling, intersected with a shot of either a) a scantily clad woman or b) a baby, lends two completely different meanings to the scene, and thus illustrates the importance of editing as a vehicle for the narrative.
    Although Cooper doesn't discount the importance of editing, I believe a more collaborative approach that recognizes the central importance of shot construction is the best way to analyze a film such as "Suspicion."
    When the eye-lines of the two lovers don't match, we as an audience are drawn into feeling discontent and incoherent, which further invests us in the emotions of the characters. While this is a spatial transformation in the discontinuity between the localities of the two lover, at the same time it is an editing device that cleverly structures the narrative so that the shot angle itself, and the length of each shot, create an underlying visual dialogue that enriches the narrative, just as you pointed out.

    Therefore, I completely agree with you on the importance of the shot-reverse-shot, and its evolution in parallel to the plot-line. Within Cooper's theoretical framework, however, I believe that he should acknowledge the collaborative effect of spatial transformation with editing and shot composition in developing the narrative, as is evident in Hitchcock's dynamic use of the shot-reverse-shot, and his "tutorial," if you will, on the insert shot.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While watching "Suspicion," I was almost constantly filled with a sense of apprehension; as Lina feel further into turmoil, so did I. However, I'll admit that it was only when I first read this blog post that I realized that a great portion of that nervousness was the result of the shot/reverse shot technique employed by Hitchcock, and how that filmic technique served to place Lina and Johnnie into two separate narrative spaces: though they sat right beside each other, they were almost constantly shot separately, and the importance of that was something I had noticed but hadn't quite understood until I read this blog post. By placing the two side by side and yet in totally different worlds, the feeling of suspicion is enhanced.

    The emphasis on lighting, and how it serves to cast an even greater aura of intrigue and drama, was another thing I found interesting; it creates a narrative space wherein an air of tenseness is allowed to grow and fester, and I like the examples you gave of this lightning, as well as your mention of its possible use as foreshadowing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You do a great job about pinpointing how Hitchcock creates the mood and portrays the evolution of Lina's suspicion towards Johnnie. The lighting and the shadows (especially the main foyer of their house as you have pictured) create these ominous visuals for the audience. Johnnie's walk with the glass of milk is arguably the most important and most impressive sequence of the film, and I like how you dissected it. The bars of shadows amongst light play a role in the film, and tend to appear at the most important parts of the movie (when Lina writes the note saying she has left Johnnie, the milk scene etc). I also enjoyed your analysis of the shot reverse shot, and had not thought how Hitchcock does employ that technique to further make the audience apprehensive and on edge.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In my opinion, you do an excellent job at stressing the importance of “narrative space” in a film. From what we have learned in class and in the readings, the actual screenplay is at times is subservient in importance to the camera. The way in which the camera portrays “narrative space” is integral to telling a story way it is supposed to be told. Moreover, your analysis of Hitchcock’s use of the shot reverse shot was exemplary. Suspense and truth is once again created by alternate shots of characters. Your claim, “It is the audience’s interpretation, namely how the connect the shots, that also creates a feeling of suspicion in the film,” furthered this point. In addition, the emphasis you put on lighting was integral but I believe that importance of black and white should have also been mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great post Arielle!
    This is exactly the type of attention to detail within the film and integration of the reading material that I love to see! Keep up the good work!
    Best,
    Alexis (the person grading the blogs)

    ReplyDelete
  7. I feel that way you commented on Hitchcock's use of lighting and shot-reverse-shots perfectly highlights the way in which narrative space is used to draw the audience into the film. As was brought up in Cooper's article, I believe that this film represents a contemporary and intelligent transformation of the use of film not just as a snapshot into reality, but as a symbolic and powerful tool to narrate.

    ReplyDelete